Oklahoma Farm Report: Democrats and Republicans Denounce Waxman-Markey Climate Change Bill in House Ag Committee Hearing

Jun 12, 2009
In The News

Democrats and Republicans Denounce Waxman-Markey Climate Change Bill in House Ag Committee Hearing The House Agriculture Committee held a hearing Thursday on the much talked about Waxman-Markey climate change and energy legislation. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Committee Chairman Henry Waxman want to push the bill through rather quickly. But, Ranking Member, Frank Lucas, said – the most important thing we can do for our agriculture community is allow the legislative process to work, to take the time to understand the consequences of our actions.

Lucas said here we are today with our first public hearing to consider a bill that is written to last forever. This is a bill that is enormous in size and consequence that has the potential to permanently damage the standard of living for every man, woman, and child for decades to come.

Lucas pointed out that the cap-and-trade part of the bill – creates a national energy tax that will do more harm to production agriculture, American industry, and our standard of living than it will do any good for the environment. As for its affect on agriculture, Lucas said – I cannot support a bill that will damage an industry that consistently provides America and the world with an abundant and affordable food and fiber supply.

The lead witness in the hearing was Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack, who was in front of the lawmakers for just over three hours. He not only was told that this bill was unacceptable by the Republicans, but House Democrats got their licks in as well. In fact, House Ag Democrats and Republicans told Secretary Vilsack there will be no climate change bill – or none agriculture can live with – unless the Administration forces changes in the pending measure approved by the House Energy and Commerce Committee.

Democrat Leonard Boswell told fellow Iowan Vilsack he could not support his party’s climate change bill as written – and probably none on the Ag Committee could either.

Later in the hearing, six farm leaders offered their perspective and several key points surfaced. One was the exclusion of agriculture from being listed in the bill as an industry that would participate in the offset program that would make up a key part of the bill. In addition, ag groups repeated over and over the need to have USDA oversee any offset program for agriculture, not the EPA.

We have an audio overview of the bill linked below on our Listen Bar. It includes the give and take between Frank Lucas and the six farm leaders, as he asked them for a thumbs up or thumbs down on the Waxman-Markey bill as currently written, saying that this is very likely the bill that the full House will have to vote on in two weeks.

# # #

Recent Posts


Feb 21, 2024
Agriculture

Lucas Stands Up for Oklahoma Beef Producers

Washington, DC – Today, Congressman Frank Lucas (OK-03) joined an effort to halt the Biden Administration’s rule allowing for the importation of fresh Paraguayan beef, which has historically been affected by the viral foot-and-mouth disease. The USDA’s most recent inspection of cattle in Paraguay was nearly a decade ago.  Congressman Lucas (OK-03) joined Rep. Ronny Jackson’s (TX-13) joint resolution […]



Feb 20, 2024
Agriculture

Lucas: USDA fails to deliver support to Oklahoma farmers.

Washington, DC – At today’s House Agriculture Committee hearing, Congressman Lucas questioned Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack over the Biden Administration’s failed Emergency Relief Program (ERP). Congressman Lucas noted that producers in Oklahoma were feeling the negative affects of the ERP 2022 program. Secretary Vilsack questioned this claim, prompting Congressman Lucas to defend his constituents. Click here or […]



Feb 6, 2024
Economy

Secretary Yellen Dodges Basel Endgame Questioning

Washington, DC – Today, Congressman Lucas followed up with Secretary Yellen on whether Treasury has discussed the impact of the Basel Endgame proposal with the Federal Reserve. When asked a straightforward question on the detrimental impact of the proposal, Secretary Yellen had no answer. February 6, 2024 Lucas: “Are you concerned that the proposal will undermine the […]