Farm Futures: Farm Bureau, Representatives Express Concern About Current Climate Legislation

May 19, 2009
In The News

The American Clean Energy and Security Act is drawing fire from several directions. In addition to receiving a letter expressing the concerns of the National Corn Growers Association on Monday, the House Energy and Commerce Committee also heard from the American Farm Bureau Federation. President Bob Stallman stated that the legislation ignores the complex needs of a very diverse U.S. agricultural industry, saying the bill fails to include key principles critical to U.S. agriculture including leaving ag out of the greenhouse gas cap provisions.

"The (bill) is laden with so many policy prescriptions that its impact on the U.S. is almost impossible to measure and evaluate," Stallman said. "We can be certain of some things, however—it will increase our operating costs and reduce our competitiveness abroad."

Several members of Congress have voice serious opposition to provisions of the bill, especially how it deals with biofuels. Last week House Ag Committee Chairman Collin Peterson, D-Minn., and Ranking Member Frank Lucas, R-Okla., along with a bipartisan group of 42 co-sponsors introduced the Renewable Fuels Standard Improvement Act to reverse unfair measures in the Environmental Protection Agency’s proposed rule on greenhouse gas emissions. Peterson has said he refuses to support any climate change emission limits on biofuels production. According to AFBF energy specialist Anne Steckel those demands could be part of the deliberations this week.

"The legislation that Chairman Peterson introduced is a strong signal of support for the biofuels industry," Steckel said. "I think it will be taken seriously as we move into the climate change legislation."

Also moving against portions of the legislation is the Rural America Solutions Group, a group of Representatives of which Lucas is a co-chair. They point out that residents in rural areas must travel farther for routine errands; rural households spend 58% more on fuel than urban residents as a percentage of income; and industries that will be most negatively impacted by higher energy costs include: agriculture, manufacturing, construction, transportation, mining, and utilities.

# # #

Recent Posts


Feb 21, 2024
Agriculture

Lucas Stands Up for Oklahoma Beef Producers

Washington, DC – Today, Congressman Frank Lucas (OK-03) joined an effort to halt the Biden Administration’s rule allowing for the importation of fresh Paraguayan beef, which has historically been affected by the viral foot-and-mouth disease. The USDA’s most recent inspection of cattle in Paraguay was nearly a decade ago.  Congressman Lucas (OK-03) joined Rep. Ronny Jackson’s (TX-13) joint resolution […]



Feb 20, 2024
Agriculture

Lucas: USDA fails to deliver support to Oklahoma farmers.

Washington, DC – At today’s House Agriculture Committee hearing, Congressman Lucas questioned Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack over the Biden Administration’s failed Emergency Relief Program (ERP). Congressman Lucas noted that producers in Oklahoma were feeling the negative affects of the ERP 2022 program. Secretary Vilsack questioned this claim, prompting Congressman Lucas to defend his constituents. Click here or […]



Feb 6, 2024
Economy

Secretary Yellen Dodges Basel Endgame Questioning

Washington, DC – Today, Congressman Lucas followed up with Secretary Yellen on whether Treasury has discussed the impact of the Basel Endgame proposal with the Federal Reserve. When asked a straightforward question on the detrimental impact of the proposal, Secretary Yellen had no answer. February 6, 2024 Lucas: “Are you concerned that the proposal will undermine the […]