Associated Press: Oklahoma Delegation Unanimous against Climate Bill

Jun 27, 2009
In The News

Oklahoma’s U.S. House delegation unanimously opposed a controversial climate bill that would place the nation’s first limits on pollution linked to global warming.

The bill passed 219-212 on Friday and now goes to the Senate, where Oklahoma’s only Democratic House member, Rep. Dan Boren, predicted it will be defeated, the Tulsa World reported from its Washington bureau.

Boren went against his party’s leadership in voting against the bill. Republican Reps. Mary Fallin, Frank Lucas and Tom Cole all joined Boren in opposition. GOP Rep. John Sullivan, who has taken a temporary leave from Congress, did not vote.

At the White House, President Barack Obama said the bill would create jobs, and added that with its vote, the House had put America on a path toward leading the way toward "creating a 21st century global economy."

But Boren and his Oklahoma colleagues disagreed, saying the bill would damage the state’s agriculture and energy sectors and punish its families.

"This legislation will saddle all Oklahoma families, seniors living on fixed incomes, and small businesses struggle to survive the current downturn with what is essentially a tax on energy usage in all forms, from gasoline to utility bills," Boren said.

"The bill imposes enormous new costs on Oklahoma’s electric companies by forcing them to purchase carbon allowances to be compliant with emission reductions."

The legislation would require the U.S. to reduce carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions by 17 percent from 2005 levels by 2020 and by about 80 percent by mid-century. U.S. carbon dioxide emissions from the burning of fossil fuels are rising at about 1 percent a year and are predicted to continue increasing without mandatory limits.

The bill would allow the government to limit heat-trapping pollution from factories, refineries and power plants and issue allowances for polluters. Boren said that would force Oklahomans to pay for extra carbon allowances while other states would receive allowances for free.

Lucas called the bill "the single largest economic threat to our farmers and ranchers in decades." He said the bill would not only cause costs to rise for agricultural producers, but it also would shrink their markets, because foreign competitors would be allowed to undersell them.

Cole said those who live in rural areas who must commute long distances would be disproportionately affected, while Fallin said the bill would devastate Oklahoma’s energy producers by placing restrictions on the production and exploration of oil and natural gas.

# # #

Recent Posts

Feb 21, 2024

Lucas Stands Up for Oklahoma Beef Producers

Washington, DC – Today, Congressman Frank Lucas (OK-03) joined an effort to halt the Biden Administration’s rule allowing for the importation of fresh Paraguayan beef, which has historically been affected by the viral foot-and-mouth disease. The USDA’s most recent inspection of cattle in Paraguay was nearly a decade ago.  Congressman Lucas (OK-03) joined Rep. Ronny Jackson’s (TX-13) joint resolution […]

Feb 20, 2024

Lucas: USDA fails to deliver support to Oklahoma farmers.

Washington, DC – At today’s House Agriculture Committee hearing, Congressman Lucas questioned Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack over the Biden Administration’s failed Emergency Relief Program (ERP). Congressman Lucas noted that producers in Oklahoma were feeling the negative affects of the ERP 2022 program. Secretary Vilsack questioned this claim, prompting Congressman Lucas to defend his constituents. Click here or […]

Feb 6, 2024

Secretary Yellen Dodges Basel Endgame Questioning

Washington, DC – Today, Congressman Lucas followed up with Secretary Yellen on whether Treasury has discussed the impact of the Basel Endgame proposal with the Federal Reserve. When asked a straightforward question on the detrimental impact of the proposal, Secretary Yellen had no answer. February 6, 2024 Lucas: “Are you concerned that the proposal will undermine the […]